GAMES. COLLECTIBLES. BAD DECISIONS.
Keep Joking Joystick in your feed.Choose us as a preferred source on Google.
Add as a Preferred Source on GoogleGameplay, atmosphere, and the details that make a game worth your time. Clear verdicts for your next adventure.
Reviews with an editorial score out of ten.
45 reviews
A beautifully rebuilt, thoughtfully refined Ocarina of Time that favors preservation over reinvention. Its camera, jumping, audiovisual work, and selective quality-of-life changes make a persuasive return, though stiff voice work and limited structural surprise keep it from feeling fully new.
A fast, focused roguelite shooter whose destructible arenas and extensive weapon mods create consistently exciting buildcraft. Visual overload and comparatively slight boss encounters stop the chaos from feeling fully refined, but the central loop is inventive and compelling.
A remarkably assured action game whose weapon depth, boss variety, exploration, and Wuxian presentation outweigh a less compelling story, some late repetition, and a divisive ending structure.
A strong Modern Warfare sendoff whose campaign has real stakes but uneven character payoff. Its lasting strength is a varied multiplayer suite: thoughtful weapon customization, effective map range, exhilarating 24v24 Combat Outpost, and a tense DMZ mode make it a compelling choice for competitive and squad-focused FPS players.
Tenebris Somnia makes its retro ingredients feel purposeful. Its live-action sequences strengthen both the scares and Julia’s emotional journey, while inventive puzzles and measured combat keep the apartment-bound nightmare moving. Occasional overexplanation slightly dulls the mystery, but this is a confident, compact horror adventure for players who enjoy thought as much as tension.
A lively, accessible motion-sports collection with a genuinely useful solo ladder, but its long-term strength rests on multiplayer and the events that receive inventive variants.
Final Fantasy Resonance turns a mobile-era foundation into a satisfying standalone RPG. Its Vision system makes series callbacks meaningful through flexible builds, while the cast, HD-2D presentation, and brisk campaign provide momentum. Thin exploration and unremarkable dungeons limit the journey, but the core is strong.
A confident aerial-action campaign with varied objectives, compelling squadron stakes, and forceful flight handling. Multiplayer has a strong core, but menu friction, upgrade grinding, and cosmetic monetization keep it from matching the campaign’s clean momentum.
A strong gothic action adventure that makes combat choice, investigation and backtracking reinforce one another. Its early mysteries are more guided than its best late-game hunts, but Rose’s flexible toolkit and Paris’s secrets give the journey lasting momentum.
A distinctive first-person Soulslike whose excellent weapon, parry, firearm, and psychic-power interplay eventually overcomes a frustratingly unbalanced opening. The Napoleonic horror setting is memorable, but its story does less with that premise than the combat does.
A substantial survival-crafting RPG with rewarding lore, exploration, and building, RuneScape: Dragonwilds too often buries its best ideas under escalating resource demands, workshop clutter, and uncertain progression.
A committed Hellraiser atmosphere and occasionally inventive puzzle-box abilities cannot overcome weak-feeling combat, uneven challenge, unreliable resources, and technical faults that repeatedly break immersion and progression.
Platform and edition details appear when they are known. Check those details before applying a review to a different release.
Stars offer a quick overview. The written verdict and scoring rationale explain who a game may suit and what may hold it back.
Look for what works, what gets in the way, and who the game might suit. A strong recommendation still leaves room for a different taste in games.
Each score is an editorial assessment of the strengths and weaknesses discussed in the written review. Partial stars show decimal scores. Why this score gives the reasoning behind the rating.
These are editorial ratings. Reviews without an assigned score display their written verdict.
